For example, this moronic study http://www.aolnews.com/health/article/study-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer/19348936?icid=main|main|dl1|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fhealth%2Farticle%2Fstudy-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer%2F19348936
Claims sugar causes cancer - if the sugar is in the form of soda pop. So you find out where the study came from and it's from the government of Singapore - the country that whips you with 7 foot long Ratton canes soaked in water on the bare assss if you spit on the sidewalk.
You obviously can't trust THAT study.
Similarly, the global warming scam - government-sponsored "scientists' using back-filled data and 100 iterations to reach the pre-determined "conclusion".
The cell phone cancer scare, funded by trial lawyers, salivating over the next "asbestos" type lawsuit lottery.
It never stops. Should we conclude that all "scientific" studies that are widely published on lowest common denominator sites like AOL and Yahoo news are fraudulent?
Orignal From: Do you think whenever "scientific" studies are published to the general public, there is a hidden agenda?
Post a Comment