The flue gas scrub water from fertilizer plants are added directly into municipal water supply systems under the guise of adding fluoride. The toxic chemical waste water would cost about $5,000.00 per truck load to dispose of safely, but in the US, it is sold to municipalities and diluted with our drinking water. Most European countries do not add "fluoride" and other flue contaminants to their drinking water.
The US has been through this propaganda war before with lead in gasoline and the dangers of asbestos and tobacco consumption.
Don't you think that Colgate should be worried about future litigation because of its funding of biased pro fluoride research?
The addition of fluoride to drinking water is considered a success story at the federal government. However, rates of HCC liver cancer tripled between 1975 and 2005. It increased from 1.6 to 4.9 cases per 100,000 persons. This cancer is rare, but it is easy to cause this cancer by adding fluoride to the water of laboratory rats. Neurological effects have been found in rats at low levels of only 5 parts per million. Drinking water is at about 1 part per million fluoride.
How can the government collude with industry to make its population drink industrial waste products instead of disposing of them safely?
My sister is dying from this rare cancer, and I believe it is due to her exposure to fluoride and mercury as a dental assistant over a 30 year career.
Why do we allow flue pollution in our drinking water?
Who said anything about power plants? Flue waste water from fertilizer plants ends up in our drinking water along with lead and fluoride. Aluminum manufacturing, and uranium enrichment also produce fluoride. You appear to be a bit narrow minded.
Source: "The Fluoride Deception"
What's your source? Bigotry?
Orignal From: Why is flue pollution added to our drinking water?
Post a Comment